![]() ![]() Fewer than 45,000 units still exist in fewer than 75 Mitchell-Lama buildings.Īccording to New York State housing officials, the diminished supply of Mitchell-Lama housing is the result of owners or building boards opting to pay off mortgages and convert the buildings to market rate rentals or sales. Sixty years after Mitchell-Lama arose, the number of apartment complexes, co-ops and other Mitchell-Lama program buildings has dropped significantly. But the units are now transitioning to market-rate apartments, like this 3-bedroom, 1-bathroom unit at 310 Greenwich Street, which was listed for rent at market rates now of over $6,395 per month. With 1,260 apartments and townhouses located in three towers at 310 Greenwich Street, 40 Harrison Street and 80 North Moore Street, the complex was built in 1972 under the Mitchell-Lama rent-protection program. One example is the Independence Plaza North complex in Tribeca. Some prominent Mitchell-Lama complexes still exist, despite market forces that have led to privatization of some of the original complexes. With about 100,000 units in its heyday, Mitchell-Lama buildings and complexes were located in formerly blighted areas of Manhattan, including the Upper West Side, Chelsea, Lower East Side and in the Bronx, Queens and Brooklyn, too. ![]() The program is administered by the New York City Housing and Preservation Department and has offered income-restricted rentals and “limited equity” co-ops. Named after the two lawmakers who originated the legislation creating the program (New York State Senator MacNeil Mitchell and Assemblyman Alfred Lama), Mitchell-Lama buildings numbered 269 at the program’s peak in the 1960s and ‘70s. If you are a rent-stabilized tenant, you are prohibited from charging a roommate more than a proportionate share of the rent.Among the subsidized housing programs in New York City, Mitchell-Lama has provided affordable housing to tens of thousands of New Yorkers since its inception in 1955. However, it doesn't say anything about Mitchell Lama, and it goes on to say things like: Check your program’s guidelines before taking in household members. Also, bringing in a roommate may make your income too high to remain eligible for the program. Failure to accurately report this income can be a serious violation of the program's rules and could lead to termination of the program as well as legal actions. Most programs require that you report what the roommate pays in rent as part of your income. There are additional considerations if you receive a rent subsidy (such as Section 8 or FEPS) or a rent exemption (such as SCRIE or DRIE), or if your rent is based on your income. if two or more people have signed the lease, and your lease does not expressly give you permission to live with an additional person.you live in public housing or most subsidized housing, or.You do not have a right to a roommate if: Then you have the right to share your apartment with one other adult not related to you, and that person’s dependent children. If you are the only person who signed your lease (for rent control: if you are the only tenant of record), If you live in a privately owned building, and I did find the following reference which stated this: New York State has a law that says that landlords cannot prevent tenants from having a roommate.ĭoes this apply to the Mitchell Lama housing program? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |